ugh
so now that I?m editing my own weddings I realize?
while Sony is 1000x more convenient (in my opinion) while SHOOTING,? there isn?t as much support for the editing side (limited profiles in LR, no Sony specific presets in VSCO, etc), which makes editing 1000?s of photos a bitch. It?s hard to get the color how I want it just with lightroom, where I don?t have as much of that problem when editing Canon/Nikon photos (for the people I edit weddings for), especially when I can use VSCO.
I?m so torn. I really love the a99. There are so many kick ass features that I really don?t want to give up now that I?m used to them. Individually editing photos (like LR to PS) I see no difference between Sony/Canon/Nikon, so I didn?t realize until I shot a whole wedding myself with Sony the problems with basic editing.
If Sony had better editing support I?d stay with Sony no problem, or if Canon (or even NIkon, though I?m partial to Canon) had the same features as Sony (EVF (!!!!!!!) and all that comes with that, AF range, movable LCD, what I feel is more accurate focusing, etc), I?d switch back to Canon. I?m not sure what side is more important, the shooting side, or the editing side. And honestly I don?t feel like dealing with selling all my shit and buying back Canon stuff just to make editing better but editing wedding stuff on my Sony files is driving me crazy (and thinking about working with second shooters with a canon/nikon cam slipped into my files? sounds really annoying.. now I see why people ask for same brand camera when being considered for second shooting). UGH IDK
Source: http://emilygt.tumblr.com/post/54944254463
collateral dick cheney heart umf elite eight stephon marbury the lion king suzanne collins
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন